Advertisement
HMN vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.45%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
HMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.01% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Specialty Stores (-0.93% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| HMN | RUSHA | HMN / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 1.5B | 4.12B | 36% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 737M | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.109 | -4.276 | -96% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.55 | 12.75 | 263% |
| Revenue | 1.43B | 7.93B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 552M | 184M | 300% |
| Total Debt | 546M | 1.81B | 30% |
HMN | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HMN's Valuation (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as RUSHA (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HMN (46) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (100) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HMN (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HMN (54) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HMN (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
| HMN | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 56% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 8 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
HMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMN | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| CINF - HMN | 69% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| L - HMN | 67% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| SAFT - HMN | 67% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| THG - HMN | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| CNA - HMN | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -3.32% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| LAD - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | -5.36% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | -5.70% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 69% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||