HMRFF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SASKF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.01 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
103.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMRFF vs SASKF

Header iconHMRFF vs SASKF Comparison
Open Charts HMRFF vs SASKFBanner chart's image
HOMERUN RES
Price$0.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
Atha Energy
Price$0.46
Change+$0.01 (+2.22%)
Volume$23.78K
Capitalization103.86M
HMRFF vs SASKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SASKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMRFF vs. SASKF commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMRFF is a Hold and SASKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HMRFF: $0.80 vs. SASKF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: HMRFF and SASKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMRFF: 16% vs. SASKF: 55%
Market capitalization -- HMRFF: $0 vs. SASKF: $103.86M
HMRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. SASKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $103.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSASKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SASKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SASKF is a better buy in the long-term than HMRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SASKF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SASKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HMRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.88% price change this week, while SASKF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SASKF YTD gains are higher at: 17.128 vs. HMRFF (-9.981).
HMRFFSASKFHMRFF / SASKF
CapitalizationN/A104M-
EBITDAN/A-1.3M-
Gain YTD-9.98117.128-58%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A39.8M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMRFF: Fundamental Ratings
HMRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SASKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SASKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBBIX10.22N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced I
PGILX36.42N/A
N/A
Putnam Focused Equity Y
LADCX9.75N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
PEIJX40.44N/A
N/A
Principal Equity Income J
PMIAX10.80N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income A

HMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRFF and GAYMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRFF and GAYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRFF
1D Price
Change %
HMRFF100%
N/A
GAYMF - HMRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
OPWEF - HMRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
TROYF - HMRFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+7.23%
KOOYF - HMRFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SASKF - HMRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

SASKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SASKF and WRLGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SASKF and WRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SASKF
1D Price
Change %
SASKF100%
+1.07%
WRLGF - SASKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+9.05%
EXNRF - SASKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.49%
ARMN - SASKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
DPMLF - SASKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
THM - SASKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.05%
More