Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SPMGX
HMSFX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SPMGX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMGX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. HMSFX (77.5M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SPMGX: HMSFX (8.39) vs SPMGX (5.42). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). SPMGX (3.36) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SPMGX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.58 vs. HMSFX (15.98). SPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 248.93 vs. HMSFX (220.16).
| HMSFX | SPMGX | HMSFX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 3.36 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 3.36 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.783 | 4.024 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.5M | 1.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.39 | 5.42 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.98 | 18.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.47 | 101.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 220.16 | 248.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement