HOG
Price
$24.21
Change
-$0.18 (-0.74%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
52 days until earnings call
OSW
Price
$18.86
Change
-$0.12 (-0.63%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOG vs OSW

Header iconHOG vs OSW Comparison
Open Charts HOG vs OSWBanner chart's image
Harley-Davidson
Price$24.21
Change-$0.18 (-0.74%)
Volume$1.69M
Capitalization5.97B
OneSpaWorld Holdings
Price$18.86
Change-$0.12 (-0.63%)
Volume$508.66K
Capitalization1.35B
HOG vs OSW Comparison Chart
Loading...
HOG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOG vs. OSW commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOG is a StrongBuy and OSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (HOG: $24.21 vs. OSW: $18.86)
Brand notoriety: HOG: Notable vs. OSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOG: 75% vs. OSW: 63%
Market capitalization -- HOG: $5.97B vs. OSW: $1.35B
HOG [@Recreational Products] is valued at $5.97B. OSW’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSW is a better buy in the long-term than HOG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOG is a better buy in the short-term than OSW.

Price Growth

HOG (@Recreational Products) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while OSW (@Recreational Products) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

OSW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.75% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOG($5.97B) has a higher market cap than OSW($1.35B). OSW has higher P/E ratio than HOG: OSW (1333.00) vs HOG (8.94). OSW YTD gains are higher at: -4.806 vs. HOG (-19.096). HOG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. OSW (38.9M). HOG has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. OSW (27.7M). OSW has less debt than HOG: OSW (171M) vs HOG (7.2B). HOG has higher revenues than OSW: HOG (5.84B) vs OSW (794M).
HOGOSWHOG / OSW
Capitalization5.97B1.35B444%
EBITDA1.06B38.9M2,715%
Gain YTD-19.096-4.806397%
P/E Ratio8.941333.001%
Revenue5.84B794M735%
Total Cash1.53B27.7M5,538%
Total Debt7.2B171M4,208%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOG vs OSW: Fundamental Ratings
HOG
OSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8024
SMR RATING
1..100
6459
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3785
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOG's Valuation (30) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as OSW (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOG (80) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOG’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's SMR Rating (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HOG (64) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to HOG’s over the last 12 months.

OSW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HOG (61) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to HOG’s over the last 12 months.

HOG's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSW (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOGOSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCS6.420.07
+1.10%
PIMCO STRATEGIC Income FUND
FLCO21.320.12
+0.57%
Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF
UTG34.600.11
+0.32%
Reaves Utility Income Fund
DEED20.920.05
+0.23%
First Trust Securitized Plus ETF
BNDD12.40-0.04
-0.33%
Quadratic Deflation ETF

HOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOG has been closely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOG jumps, then BC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOG
1D Price
Change %
HOG100%
-0.74%
BC - HOG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
PII - HOG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
LCII - HOG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
MBUU - HOG
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WGO - HOG
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More

OSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then BC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSW
1D Price
Change %
OSW100%
-0.63%
BC - OSW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
PRKS - OSW
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
FUN - OSW
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.03%
HOG - OSW
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
LCII - OSW
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More