HPP
Price
$2.77
Change
-$0.07 (-2.46%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
896.05M
20 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$64.49
Change
+$1.21 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.8B
13 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HPP vs RMBS

Header iconHPP vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts HPP vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Hudson Pacific Properties
Price$2.77
Change-$0.07 (-2.46%)
Volume$108.58K
Capitalization896.05M
Rambus
Price$64.49
Change+$1.21 (+1.91%)
Volume$8.46K
Capitalization6.8B
HPP vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HPP vs. RMBS commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPP is a Hold and RMBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HPP: $2.78 vs. RMBS: $64.53)
Brand notoriety: HPP and RMBS are both not notable
HPP represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while RMBS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HPP: 72% vs. RMBS: 99%
Market capitalization -- HPP: $896.05M vs. RMBS: $6.93B
HPP [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $896.05M. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $6.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.16T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HPP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HPP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than HPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HPP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HPP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HPP is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

HPP (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.58% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

HPP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.56% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Semiconductors (+0.94% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBS($6.8B) has a higher market cap than HPP($896M). HPP has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: HPP (588.24) vs RMBS (33.13). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 19.712 vs. HPP (-8.251). HPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 448M vs. RMBS (276M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 514M vs. HPP (100M). RMBS has less debt than HPP: RMBS (29.2M) vs HPP (4.4B). HPP has higher revenues than RMBS: HPP (952M) vs RMBS (605M).
HPPRMBSHPP / RMBS
Capitalization896M6.8B13%
EBITDA448M276M162%
Gain YTD-8.25119.712-42%
P/E Ratio588.2433.131,775%
Revenue952M605M157%
Total Cash100M514M19%
Total Debt4.4B29.2M15,072%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HPP vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
HPP
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HPP's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as RMBS (73) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that HPP’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPP (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew significantly faster than HPP’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPP (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPP’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as HPP (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to HPP’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPP (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew significantly faster than HPP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HPPRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMZX26.810.13
+0.49%
Macquarie Emerging Markets R6
AWTIX20.55N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water Inst
AFGFX84.22N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth R6
FSQIX10.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq I
IGNRX16.37-0.19
-1.15%
Macquarie Natural Resources R

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-1.22%
LRCX - RMBS
80%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
AMKR - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
KLIC - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
QCOM - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
KLAC - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
More