Ad is loading...
HQICX vs RMFEX
HQICX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMFEX
Hartford Equity Income C
Price$19.56
Change+$1.15 (+6.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.46B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.89
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
HQICX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. HQICX (4.46B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMFEX (1.61) vs HQICX (1.04). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HQICX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). HQICX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMFEX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. HQICX (-9.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. HQICX (17.60).
| HQICX | RMFEX | HQICX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.715 | -7.620 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.46B | 98.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.61 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.23 | -4.11 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.11 | 0.28 | -6,188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.60 | 47.69 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.86 | 51.93 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...