HRZN
Price
$8.50
Change
-$0.51 (-5.66%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
377.4M
26 days until earnings call
MSIF
Price
$15.17
Change
-$1.05 (-6.47%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
298.94M
Ad is loading...

HRZN vs MSIF

Header iconHRZN vs MSIF Comparison
Open Charts HRZN vs MSIFBanner chart's image
Horizon Technology Finance
Price$8.50
Change-$0.51 (-5.66%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization377.4M
MSC Income Fund
Price$15.17
Change-$1.05 (-6.47%)
Volume$554
Capitalization298.94M
HRZN vs MSIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRZN vs. MSIF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRZN is a Hold and MSIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HRZN: $9.01 vs. MSIF: $16.22)
Brand notoriety: HRZN and MSIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRZN: 187% vs. MSIF: 43%
Market capitalization -- HRZN: $377.4M vs. MSIF: $298.94M
HRZN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $377.4M. MSIF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $298.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRZN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HRZN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSIF is a better buy in the long-term than HRZN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRZN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HRZN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HRZN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while MSIF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRZN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRZN($377M) has a higher market cap than MSIF($299M). HRZN has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: HRZN (20.82) vs MSIF (3.36). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: 41.469 vs. HRZN (3.816). HRZN (462M) and MSIF (473M) have identical debt. MSIF has higher revenues than HRZN: MSIF (53.2M) vs HRZN (-9.87M).
HRZNMSIFHRZN / MSIF
Capitalization377M299M126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.81641.4699%
P/E Ratio20.823.36619%
Revenue-9.87M53.2M-19%
Total Cash46.6MN/A-
Total Debt462M473M98%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRZN: Fundamental Ratings
HRZN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRZN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDGIX22.47N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth I
ACMVX15.88N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value Inv
CSIRX26.82N/A
N/A
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst3
AVENX11.92N/A
N/A
Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity G
RYMGX45.85N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth A

HRZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRZN has been loosely correlated with SCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRZN jumps, then SCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRZN
1D Price
Change %
HRZN100%
-4.35%
SCM - HRZN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
HTGC - HRZN
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
MAIN - HRZN
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
NXDT - HRZN
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
FDUS - HRZN
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSIF and PWM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSIF and PWM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
-1.04%
PWM - MSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
RAND - MSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
TPVG - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
HRZN - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
SCM - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More