Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHAX vs TRCLX
HSHAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHAX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.7M
HSHAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 46.7M vs. HSHAX (17.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: TRCLX (1.61) vs HSHAX (0.37). HSHAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHAX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). HSHAX (2.10) and TRCLX (2.10) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHAX (57.00). HSHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HSHAX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). HSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.46 vs. TRCLX (14.38). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.76 vs. HSHAX (-14.85).
| HSHAX | TRCLX | HSHAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.03 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.10 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.911 | 12.027 | 49% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 46.7M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.61 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.46 | 14.38 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.21 | -8.08 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.85 | -3.76 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement