Ad is loading...
HSHAX vs TRCLX
HSHAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHAX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.31
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.71M
HSHAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 42.7M vs. HSHAX (16.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: TRCLX (1.71) vs HSHAX (0.39). HSHAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHAX (5 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). HSHAX (2.10) and TRCLX (2.10) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHAX (57.00). HSHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HSHAX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). HSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. TRCLX (3.95). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.38 vs. HSHAX (-6.84).
| HSHAX | TRCLX | HSHAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.03 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.10 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.576 | 5.587 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 42.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 3.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.63 | 5.31 | -200% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.84 | 1.38 | -494% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...