Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHCX vs MCDFX
HSHCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HSHCX vs MCDFX
Hartford Schroders China A C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
HSHCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSHCX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHCX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. HSHCX (17.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HSHCX: MCDFX (3.26) vs HSHCX (0.00). HSHCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HSHCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HSHCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HSHCX (57.00). HSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: HSHCX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (23.77) and HSHCX (23.30) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. HSHCX (-17.02).
| HSHCX | MCDFX | HSHCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.32 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 1.32 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.405 | 13.498 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 88.3M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.30 | 23.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.42 | -1.98 | 1,081% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.02 | -8.58 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement