Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHCX vs MICHX
HSHCX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts HSHCX vs MICHX
Hartford Schroders China A C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$10.14
Change+$0.11 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.19M
HSHCX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSHCX vs. MICHX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHCX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. HSHCX (17.3M). MICHX pays higher dividends than HSHCX: MICHX (1.45) vs HSHCX (0.00). HSHCX was incepted earlier than MICHX: HSHCX (5 years) vs MICHX (8 years). HSHCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). HSHCX (57.00) and MICHX (54.39) have comparable annual turnover. HSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICHX: HSHCX (2000) vs MICHX (100000). HSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.30 vs. MICHX (19.10). HSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -17.02 vs. MICHX (-45.87).
| HSHCX | MICHX | HSHCX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.20 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 1.50 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.405 | 11.921 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 60.2M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.30 | 19.10 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.42 | -16.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.02 | -45.87 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement