Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHCX vs TRCLX
HSHCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHCX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.7M
HSHCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 46.7M vs. HSHCX (17.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHCX: TRCLX (1.61) vs HSHCX (0.00). HSHCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHCX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). HSHCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHCX (57.00). HSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HSHCX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). HSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.30 vs. TRCLX (14.38). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.76 vs. HSHCX (-17.02).
| HSHCX | TRCLX | HSHCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.03 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 2.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.405 | 12.027 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 46.7M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.30 | 14.38 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.42 | -8.08 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.02 | -3.76 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement