Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHFX vs MCDFX
HSHFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HSHFX vs MCDFX
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
HSHFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSHFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. HSHFX (17.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs HSHFX (0.81). HSHFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HSHFX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HSHFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HSHFX (57.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: MCDFX (2500) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX (24.14) and MCDFX (24.06) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.37 vs. HSHFX (-13.70).
| HSHFX | MCDFX | HSHFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.32 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.413 | 13.757 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 88.3M | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 3.26 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 24.06 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.75 | -1.76 | 1,125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.70 | -8.37 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement