Ad is loading...
HSHFX vs MICHX
HSHFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts HSHFX vs MICHX
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$9.42
Change-$0.05 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
HSHFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSHFX vs. MICHX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHFX is a Hold and MICHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 65.7M vs. HSHFX (16.7M). MICHX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: MICHX (1.56) vs HSHFX (0.86). HSHFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: HSHFX (5 years) vs MICHX (7 years). HSHFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.26). HSHFX (57.00) and MICHX (54.39) have comparable annual turnover. MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: MICHX (100000) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. MICHX (1.92). HSHFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.97 vs. MICHX (-38.14).
| HSHFX | MICHX | HSHFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.20 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.26 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.772 | 3.974 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 65.7M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 1.92 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.51 | -10.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.97 | -38.14 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...