Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHFX vs MICHX
HSHFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts HSHFX vs MICHX
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$10.14
Change+$0.11 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.19M
HSHFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSHFX vs. MICHX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHFX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. HSHFX (17.2M). MICHX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: MICHX (1.45) vs HSHFX (0.81). HSHFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: HSHFX (5 years) vs MICHX (8 years). HSHFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). HSHFX (57.00) and MICHX (54.39) have comparable annual turnover. MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: MICHX (100000) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. MICHX (17.81). HSHFX return over 5 years is better than : -13.70 vs. MICHX (-46.46).
| HSHFX | MICHX | HSHFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.20 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.50 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.413 | 10.706 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 60.2M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 17.81 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.75 | -17.75 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.70 | -46.46 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement