Ad is loading...
HSHFX vs TRCLX
HSHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHFX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.71M
HSHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 42.7M vs. HSHFX (16.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: TRCLX (1.71) vs HSHFX (0.86). HSHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHFX (5 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than HSHFX (1.67). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHFX (57.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: TRCLX (500000) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. TRCLX (3.95). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.38 vs. HSHFX (-4.97).
| HSHFX | TRCLX | HSHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.03 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.772 | 5.587 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 42.7M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 3.95 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.51 | 5.31 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.97 | 1.38 | -359% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...