Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHFX vs TRCLX
HSHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHFX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.21M
HSHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 46.2M vs. HSHFX (17.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: TRCLX (1.61) vs HSHFX (0.81). HSHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHFX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than HSHFX (1.67). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHFX (57.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: TRCLX (500000) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. TRCLX (13.22). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.74 vs. HSHFX (-13.70).
| HSHFX | TRCLX | HSHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.03 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.413 | 10.890 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 46.2M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.61 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 13.22 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.75 | -9.01 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.70 | -4.74 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement