Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSHIX vs TRCLX
HSHIX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HSHIX vs TRCLX
Hartford Schroders China A I
Price$10.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.91
Change+$0.16 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.36M
HSHIX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 46.4M vs. HSHIX (17.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HSHIX: TRCLX (1.61) vs HSHIX (0.66). HSHIX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HSHIX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than HSHIX (1.79). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HSHIX (57.00). HSHIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HSHIX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). HSHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.75 vs. TRCLX (15.92). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -8.57 vs. HSHIX (-22.04).
| HSHIX | TRCLX | HSHIX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.03 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.010 | 11.269 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 46.4M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.75 | 15.92 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.08 | -7.22 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.04 | -8.57 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement