Ad is loading...
HSSCX vs TFIFX
HSSCX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs TFIFX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$22.50
Change+$0.53 (+2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.62M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$43.27
Change+$0.48 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
HSSCX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. TFIFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. HSSCX (46.6M). HSSCX pays higher dividends than TFIFX: HSSCX (2.47) vs TFIFX (1.26). HSSCX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: HSSCX (25 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.79). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. TFIFX (46.90). HSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: HSSCX (2000) vs TFIFX (500000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.21 vs. TFIFX (9.50). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 121.50 vs. HSSCX (30.02).
| HSSCX | TFIFX | HSSCX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.78 | 312% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.79 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.045 | 0.635 | -480% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 1.86B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.26 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.21 | 9.50 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.97 | 44.03 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.02 | 121.50 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.01 | N/A | - |