Ad is loading...
HSSCX vs TFIFX
HSSCX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs TFIFX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$20.75
Change+$0.18 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.09M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$39.83
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
HSSCX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. TFIFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. HSSCX (44.1M). HSSCX pays higher dividends than TFIFX: HSSCX (2.41) vs TFIFX (1.23). HSSCX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: HSSCX (25 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.82). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. TFIFX (46.90). HSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: HSSCX (2000) vs TFIFX (500000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.63 vs. TFIFX (8.71). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 112.91 vs. HSSCX (31.06).
| HSSCX | TFIFX | HSSCX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.79 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.82 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.223 | -5.550 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.1M | 1.71B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 1.23 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.63 | 8.71 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.94 | 25.38 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.06 | 112.91 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...