It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
HSTM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.39%.
HSTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2025.
OLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
HSTM | OLO | HSTM / OLO | |
Capitalization | 808M | 889M | 91% |
EBITDA | 57.1M | -47.56M | -120% |
Gain YTD | 17.450 | 34.965 | 50% |
P/E Ratio | 52.28 | 9.87 | 530% |
Revenue | 279M | 228M | 122% |
Total Cash | 71.1M | 363M | 20% |
Total Debt | 20.2M | 18.9M | 107% |
HSTM | OLO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HSTM (77) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew significantly faster than HSTM’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OLO (91) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's SMR Rating (82) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OLO (90) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HSTM (47) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to HSTM’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OLO (100) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM | OLO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago57% | 7 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago56% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | 3 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSTM has been loosely correlated with TREIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSTM jumps, then TREIF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HSTM | 100% | +0.60% | ||
TREIF - HSTM | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
PHR - HSTM | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
ACIW - HSTM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
OLO - HSTM | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
PRVA - HSTM | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OLO | 100% | +2.25% | ||
ACIW - OLO | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
SDGR - OLO | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
EEFT - OLO | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
EVCM - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
COMP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More |