Ad is loading...
HSUCX vs RGABX
HSUCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGABX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
HSUCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. HSUCX (71.2M). HSUCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HSUCX (11 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HSUCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGABX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. RGABX (1.96). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. HSUCX (12.61).
| HSUCX | RGABX | HSUCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.39 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.39 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.365 | -2.695 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 1.96 | 474% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 29.21 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.61 | 36.12 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | -84.46 | 48.37 | -175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...