Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSWCX vs MDIHX
HSWCX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts HSWCX vs MDIHX
Hartford Schroders International Stk C
Price$20.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.31B
MFS Intl Diversification R3
Price$25.84
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16B
HSWCX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSWCX vs. MDIHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSWCX is a Buy and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 42.2B vs. HSWCX (8.31B). MDIHX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: MDIHX (2.01) vs HSWCX (0.28). HSWCX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: HSWCX (9 years) vs MDIHX (20 years). HSWCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.09). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. MDIHX (3.00). MDIHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSWCX: MDIHX (0) vs HSWCX (2000). HSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. MDIHX (12.83). HSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.46 vs. MDIHX (40.36).
| HSWCX | MDIHX | HSWCX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.09 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.713 | 15.354 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.31B | 42.2B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 2.01 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 12.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.44 | 27.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.46 | 40.36 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers