Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSWCX vs VFWPX
HSWCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts HSWCX vs VFWPX
Hartford Schroders International Stk C
Price$20.13
Change+$0.17 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.33
Change+$0.70 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
HSWCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSWCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSWCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. HSWCX (8.44B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: VFWPX (2.76) vs HSWCX (0.28). HSWCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: HSWCX (9 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). HSWCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). HSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: HSWCX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (11.65) and HSWCX (11.62) have marching annual gain over last year. HSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. VFWPX (39.02).
| HSWCX | VFWPX | HSWCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.03 | 5,967% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.03 | 5,967% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.309 | 16.936 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.44B | 68B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 2.76 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 11.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.58 | 40.06 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 39.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.45 | - |