Ad is loading...
HSWCX vs VTMNX
HSWCX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSWCX vs VTMNX
Hartford Schroders International Stk C
Price$18.45
Change+$0.26 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Instl
Price$16.83
Change+$0.24 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.73B
HSWCX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSWCX vs. VTMNX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSWCX is a Buy and VTMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. HSWCX (7.39B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: VTMNX (3.07) vs HSWCX (0.31). HSWCX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: HSWCX (9 years) vs VTMNX (24 years). HSWCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VTMNX (3.00). HSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: HSWCX (2000) vs VTMNX (5000000). HSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. VTMNX (6.32). HSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 68.70 vs. VTMNX (52.26).
| HSWCX | VTMNX | HSWCX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.03 | 5,967% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.03 | 5,967% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.084 | 8.007 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 205B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 3.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | 6.32 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.17 | 14.76 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.70 | 52.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...