Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSWFX vs VFWPX
HSWFX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts HSWFX vs VFWPX
Hartford Schroders International Stk F
Price$20.65
Change+$0.17 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.33
Change+$0.70 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
HSWFX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSWFX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSWFX is a Hold and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. HSWFX (8.44B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than HSWFX: VFWPX (2.76) vs HSWFX (1.26). HSWFX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: HSWFX (8 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). HSWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). HSWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). HSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: HSWFX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). HSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.95 vs. VFWPX (11.65). HSWFX return over 5 years is better than : 58.48 vs. VFWPX (39.02).
| HSWFX | VFWPX | HSWFX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.034 | 16.936 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.44B | 68B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.76 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.95 | 11.65 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.57 | 40.06 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.48 | 39.02 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.45 | - |