Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSZCX vs NAESX
HSZCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HSZCX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$113.74
Change+$0.20 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
HSZCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSZCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSZCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HSZCX (5.79M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: HSZCX (2.71) vs NAESX (1.35). HSZCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HSZCX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HSZCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.10 vs. HSZCX (2.97). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.12 vs. HSZCX (-1.67).
| HSZCX | NAESX | HSZCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 0.17 | 1,471% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.98 | 0.17 | 4,106% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.010 | -1.139 | -264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.79M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.35 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | 9.10 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.37 | 33.44 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.67 | 71.12 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -72.41 | 102.90 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers