It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWFL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while NWFL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.
HTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
NWFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
HTB | NWFL | HTB / NWFL | |
Capitalization | 658M | 224M | 294% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 12.492 | -7.690 | -162% |
P/E Ratio | 10.97 | 115.14 | 10% |
Revenue | 203M | 54.5M | 372% |
Total Cash | 18.8M | 31.7M | 59% |
Total Debt | 10.1M | 119M | 8% |
HTB | NWFL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HTB's Valuation (88) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HTB’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.
HTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.
HTB's SMR Rating (34) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.
HTB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HTB’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.
NWFL's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTB (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NWFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTB’s over the last 12 months.
HTB | NWFL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago44% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago64% | 18 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 3 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTB has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTB jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HTB | 100% | -0.11% | ||
FMBH - HTB | 86% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
TCBK - HTB | 86% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
STBA - HTB | 85% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
MCBS - HTB | 85% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
BY - HTB | 85% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been closely correlated with FDBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then FDBC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NWFL | 100% | +1.04% | ||
FDBC - NWFL | 68% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
FNLC - NWFL | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
TCBK - NWFL | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
PFIS - NWFL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
RBCAA - NWFL | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More |