HTD | UPAR | HTD / UPAR | |
Gain YTD | 15.050 | 10.634 | 142% |
Net Assets | 914M | 55.9M | 1,635% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.65 | 302% |
Turnover | 21.00 | 12.00 | 175% |
Yield | 4.47 | 3.72 | 120% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 4 years | - |
HTD | UPAR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 11 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTD and KMI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTD and KMI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPAR has been loosely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPAR jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UPAR | 100% | +0.43% | ||
PNR - UPAR | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
SHEL - UPAR | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
WDS - UPAR | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
More |