HUN vs IFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUN is a Hold and IFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while IFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
IFF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.02% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| HUN | IFF | HUN / IFF | |
| Capitalization | 4.5B | 22.1B | 20% |
| EBITDA | 442M | -996M | -44% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 46.73 | 1367.17 | 3% |
| Revenue | 6.11B | 11.5B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 540M | 703M | 77% |
| Total Debt | 2.07B | 10.8B | 19% |
HUN | IFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (9) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFF (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew significantly faster than IFF’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as IFF (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to IFF’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's SMR Rating (90) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as IFF (94) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to IFF’s over the last 12 months.
IFF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as HUN (81) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFF (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFF’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | IFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 64% | 14 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 55% |
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been loosely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.
IFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFF has been loosely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFF jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KWR - IFF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IOSP - IFF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SCL - IFF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SXYAY - IFF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ECVT - IFF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||