HWAUF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.96M
NAUFF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWAUF vs NAUFF

Header iconHWAUF vs NAUFF Comparison
Open Charts HWAUF vs NAUFFBanner chart's image
Headwater Gold
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$45.1K
Capitalization15.96M
Nevgold
Price$0.25
Change-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Volume$25.54K
Capitalization20.8M
HWAUF vs NAUFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWAUF vs. NAUFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWAUF is a Hold and NAUFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HWAUF: $0.20 vs. NAUFF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: HWAUF and NAUFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWAUF: 105% vs. NAUFF: 43%
Market capitalization -- HWAUF: $15.96M vs. NAUFF: $20.8M
HWAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.96M. NAUFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUFF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWAUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAUFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUFF is a better buy in the short-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

HWAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.28% price change this week, while NAUFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUFF($20.8M) has a higher market cap than HWAUF($16M). NAUFF YTD gains are higher at: 69.496 vs. HWAUF (32.500). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. NAUFF (-2.57M). HWAUF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. NAUFF (1.07M). NAUFF has less debt than HWAUF: NAUFF (259K) vs HWAUF (323K). HWAUF (0) and NAUFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HWAUFNAUFFHWAUF / NAUFF
Capitalization16M20.8M77%
EBITDA-910.53K-2.57M35%
Gain YTD32.50069.49647%
P/E RatioN/A0.41-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.96M1.07M370%
Total Debt323K259K125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAUFF: Fundamental Ratings
NAUFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWAUFNAUFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVKRF0.03N/A
+5.37%
GRID BATTERY METALS INC.
BLRDY19.27N/A
N/A
Billerud AB
CZMWF67.24N/A
N/A
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
MAAL1.47N/A
N/A
Marketing Alliance, Inc. (The)
APXYY0.39N/A
N/A
Appen Ltd.

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+4.28%
SSVFF - HWAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APGOF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
DDEJF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More

NAUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUFF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUFF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUFF
1D Price
Change %
NAUFF100%
-2.11%
NSUPF - NAUFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.48%
HWAUF - NAUFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
PLG - NAUFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
SBSW - NAUFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
TEUTF - NAUFF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More