Ad is loading...
HWGAX vs TRZRX
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TRZRX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$14.51
Change+$0.20 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.06M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z
Price$14.59
Change+$0.20 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.17B
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. HWGAX (36.1M). TRZRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: TRZRX (2.42) vs HWGAX (1.10). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TRZRX (5 years). HWGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.66). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TRZRX (41.30). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TRZRX (0) vs HWGAX (2500). TRZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. HWGAX (-6.71). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.02 vs. TRZRX (69.55).
| HWGAX | TRZRX | HWGAX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.66 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.507 | 3.006 | 83% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 10.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | 3.19 | -210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | 2.22 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.02 | 69.55 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers