Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLIX vs RMFCX
HWLIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWLIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value I
Price$43.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.03M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.47
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
HWLIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWLIX (363M). HWLIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWLIX (1.49) vs RMFCX (1.26). HWLIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWLIX (38 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWLIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HWLIX (22.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWLIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. HWLIX (0.84). HWLIX return over 5 years is better than : 57.57 vs. RMFCX (52.85).
| HWLIX | RMFCX | HWLIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.234 | 9.615 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.26 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.84 | 9.26 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.51 | 22.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.57 | 52.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.98 | 77.57 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement