Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWNIX vs TRIGX
HWNIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HWNIX vs TRIGX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value I
Price$14.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.27
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.53B
HWNIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWNIX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWNIX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.5B vs. HWNIX (4.74M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HWNIX: TRIGX (2.04) vs HWNIX (1.84). HWNIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HWNIX (10 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HWNIX (4.57) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HWNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWNIX: TRIGX (2500) vs HWNIX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.56 vs. HWNIX (7.48). TRIGX (92.44) and HWNIX (91.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWNIX | TRIGX | HWNIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.57 | 0.87 | 525% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.000 | 25.074 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74M | 15.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 2.04 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 20.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.52 | 75.17 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.07 | 92.44 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.64 | - |