Ad is loading...
HYMAX vs PRFHX
HYMAX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs PRFHX
Lord Abbett High Income Muni Bond A
Price$10.86
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$11.02
Change-$0.04 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.42B
HYMAX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. PRFHX commentary
Jan 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYMAX has more cash in the bank: 4.11B vs. PRFHX (3.42B). HYMAX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: HYMAX (4.26) vs PRFHX (3.61). HYMAX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: HYMAX (20 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PRFHX (19.70). HYMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: HYMAX (1000) vs PRFHX (2500). HYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. PRFHX (5.41). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 2.63 vs. HYMAX (0.92).
| HYMAX | PRFHX | HYMAX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.366 | -0.450 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 3.42B | 120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.26 | 3.61 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 5.41 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.24 | -1.84 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.92 | 2.63 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.70 | 17.36 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...