Ad is loading...
HYMAX vs PRFHX
HYMAX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts HYMAX vs PRFHX
Lord Abbett High Income Muni Bond A
Price$10.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.04B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.34B
HYMAX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMAX vs. PRFHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMAX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYMAX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. PRFHX (3.35B). HYMAX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: HYMAX (4.52) vs PRFHX (3.88). HYMAX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: HYMAX (20 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). HYMAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). HYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. PRFHX (11.60). HYMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: HYMAX (1000) vs PRFHX (2500). HYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. PRFHX (2.57). PRFHX (11.56) and HYMAX (11.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HYMAX | PRFHX | HYMAX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.63 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.63 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.593 | -2.772 | 94% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.04B | 3.35B | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 3.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 2.57 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.64 | 5.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.52 | 11.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.43 | 15.58 | 99% |