Ad is loading...
IASMX vs TRZNX
IASMX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts IASMX vs TRZNX
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus
Price$15.04
Change+$0.27 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.23M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$16.48
Change+$0.24 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
IASMX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.73B vs. IASMX (9.23M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than IASMX: TRZNX (2.26) vs IASMX (0.45). IASMX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: IASMX (29 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). IASMX (2.43) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). TRZNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.80 vs. IASMX (4.04). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IASMX: TRZNX (0) vs IASMX (5000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. IASMX (6.29).
| IASMX | TRZNX | IASMX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.83 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.148 | -1.814 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.23M | 1.73B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.26 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 6.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.67 | 4.12 | -162% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.50 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...