IAUFF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
IEGCF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

IAUFF vs IEGCF

Header iconIAUFF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts IAUFF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
AIC Mines
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Independence Gold
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.46K
CapitalizationN/A
IAUFF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAUFF vs. IEGCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAUFF is a Hold and IEGCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IAUFF: $0.22 vs. IEGCF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: IAUFF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAUFF: 51% vs. IEGCF: 29%
Market capitalization -- IAUFF: $103.53M vs. IEGCF: $29.37M
IAUFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $103.53M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAUFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IAUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than IAUFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAUFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAUFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAUFF is a better buy in the short-term than IEGCF.

Price Growth

IAUFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -14.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAUFF($104M) has a higher market cap than IEGCF($29.4M). IAUFF YTD gains are higher at: 16.166 vs. IEGCF (-21.678). IAUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17M vs. IEGCF (-2.36M). IAUFF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. IEGCF (462K). IAUFF has higher revenues than IEGCF: IAUFF (25M) vs IEGCF (0).
IAUFFIEGCFIAUFF / IEGCF
Capitalization104M29.4M354%
EBITDA6.17M-2.36M-261%
Gain YTD16.166-21.678-75%
P/E Ratio17.95N/A-
Revenue25M0-
Total Cash30.2M462K6,537%
Total DebtN/A473K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAUFF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
IAUFF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
8898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUFF (68). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to IAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IAUFF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUFF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (98). This means that IAUFF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUFF (60). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to IAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUFF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that IAUFF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAUFFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SB3.580.01
+0.28%
Safe Bulkers
IAS10.38-0.07
-0.67%
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp
SCCO92.96-3.78
-3.91%
Southern Copper Corp
NUVL83.45-4.65
-5.28%
Nuvalent
LVLU1.00-0.10
-9.09%
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings

IAUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAUFF and PUMXF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAUFF and PUMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAUFF
1D Price
Change %
IAUFF100%
N/A
PUMXF - IAUFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWTHF - IAUFF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEGCF - IAUFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.18%
HVGDF - IAUFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPUY - IAUFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.89%
More

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEGCF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEGCF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
-5.18%
HL - IEGCF
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
ASM - IEGCF
38%
Loosely correlated
-7.63%
OCGSF - IEGCF
37%
Loosely correlated
-10.70%
AG - IEGCF
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.30%
GLGDF - IEGCF
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.39%
More