IAUFF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
PUMXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

IAUFF vs PUMXF

Header iconIAUFF vs PUMXF Comparison
Open Charts IAUFF vs PUMXFBanner chart's image
AIC Mines
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Puma Exploration
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.68K
CapitalizationN/A
IAUFF vs PUMXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAUFF vs. PUMXF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAUFF is a Hold and PUMXF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IAUFF: $0.22 vs. PUMXF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: IAUFF and PUMXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAUFF: 51% vs. PUMXF: 62%
Market capitalization -- IAUFF: $103.53M vs. PUMXF: $13.98M
IAUFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $103.53M. PUMXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAUFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IAUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUMXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than IAUFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAUFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAUFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PUMXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAUFF is a better buy in the short-term than PUMXF.

Price Growth

IAUFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUMXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAUFF($104M) has a higher market cap than PUMXF($14M). IAUFF YTD gains are higher at: 16.166 vs. PUMXF (-39.100). IAUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17M vs. PUMXF (-1.06M). IAUFF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. PUMXF (2.56M). IAUFF has higher revenues than PUMXF: IAUFF (25M) vs PUMXF (0).
IAUFFPUMXFIAUFF / PUMXF
Capitalization104M14M743%
EBITDA6.17M-1.06M-584%
Gain YTD16.166-39.100-41%
P/E Ratio17.95N/A-
Revenue25M0-
Total Cash30.2M2.56M1,180%
Total DebtN/A27.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAUFF vs PUMXF: Fundamental Ratings
IAUFF
PUMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PUMXF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IAUFF (68). This means that PUMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

PUMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUFF (100). This means that PUMXF’s stock grew similarly to IAUFF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUFF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMXF (91). This means that IAUFF’s stock grew similarly to PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUFF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMXF (64). This means that IAUFF’s stock grew similarly to PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUFF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMXF (100). This means that IAUFF’s stock grew similarly to PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAUFFPUMXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IAUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRGRX46.70N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R
IEYCX8.29-0.04
-0.48%
Delaware Climate Solutions C
RGEBX81.14-0.39
-0.48%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
EVSIX24.56-0.12
-0.49%
Allspring Disciplined US Core Inst
ACGKX21.25-0.23
-1.07%
Invesco Growth and Income C

IAUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAUFF and PUMXF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAUFF and PUMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAUFF
1D Price
Change %
IAUFF100%
N/A
PUMXF - IAUFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWTHF - IAUFF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEGCF - IAUFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
HVGDF - IAUFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPUY - IAUFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
More

PUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUMXF and DCHRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUMXF and DCHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMXF
1D Price
Change %
PUMXF100%
N/A
DCHRF - PUMXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRRF - PUMXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMPYF - PUMXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.36%
IAUFF - PUMXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - PUMXF
13%
Poorly correlated
+7.38%
More