It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICHR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSIT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICHR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSIT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ICHR (@Semiconductors) experienced а -19.72% price change this week, while NSIT (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -5.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.74%.
ICHR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
NSIT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electronics Distributors (+1.94% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
ICHR | NSIT | ICHR / NSIT | |
Capitalization | 1.27B | 6.07B | 21% |
EBITDA | 22.9M | 481M | 5% |
Gain YTD | -50.341 | -13.478 | 374% |
P/E Ratio | 33.56 | 24.66 | 136% |
Revenue | 811M | 9.18B | 9% |
Total Cash | 80M | 269M | 30% |
Total Debt | 286M | 941M | 30% |
ICHR | NSIT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICHR's Valuation (65) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NSIT (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ICHR’s stock grew similarly to NSIT’s over the last 12 months.
NSIT's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICHR (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NSIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICHR’s over the last 12 months.
NSIT's SMR Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICHR (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NSIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICHR’s over the last 12 months.
ICHR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NSIT (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ICHR’s stock grew similarly to NSIT’s over the last 12 months.
ICHR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSIT (41) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ICHR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSIT’s over the last 12 months.
ICHR | NSIT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago74% | 8 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 5 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICHR has been closely correlated with UCTT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICHR jumps, then UCTT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICHR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICHR | 100% | -23.22% | ||
UCTT - ICHR | 78% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
KLIC - ICHR | 75% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
AMAT - ICHR | 71% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
ENTG - ICHR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
COHU - ICHR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.93% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSIT has been loosely correlated with SCSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSIT jumps, then SCSC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NSIT | 100% | -1.56% | ||
SCSC - NSIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
CNXN - NSIT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
AVT - NSIT | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
SNX - NSIT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
CLMB - NSIT | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.42% | ||
More |