IEMG
Price
$78.63
Change
-$1.41 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
156.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VWO
Price
$57.72
Change
-$0.73 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
162.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEMG vs VWO

Header iconIEMG vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts IEMG vs VWOBanner chart's image
IEMG vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) vs. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

Key Takeaways

  • IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, including significant South Korea exposure (~18%), while VWO follows the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, classifying South Korea as developed and emphasizing broader China and India weights.
  • VWO offers superior diversification with over 5,000 holdings versus IEMG's ~2,660, potentially reducing concentration risk but diluting small-cap upside.
  • Expense ratios favor VWO at 0.06% over IEMG's 0.09%, providing a slight cost edge for long-term holders.
  • Both exhibit heavy technology sector tilts (IEMG ~37%, VWO ~26%), but IEMG's higher weighting amplifies volatility tied to semiconductor cycles.
  • Recent market cycles show IEMG outperforming due to South Korea's AI-driven momentum, though VWO demonstrates lower volatility for risk-averse positioning.
  • Structural liquidity remains strong for both, with massive AUM (IEMG ~$160B, VWO ~$123B) supporting tight bid-ask spreads.

Introduction

Investors seeking diversified exposure to high-growth emerging markets often compare IEMG and VWO, two leading low-cost ETFs tracking broad indices of developing economies. While both provide access to large-, mid-, and small-cap equities across Asia, Latin America, and beyond, they diverge due to index provider methodologies—particularly South Korea's classification as emerging (MSCI) versus developed (FTSE). This ETF comparison highlights structural nuances amid rotating capital flows into undervalued international assets, a weakening U.S. dollar, and AI-fueled tech rallies in recent market cycles. These alternatives suit core satellite allocations targeting long-term growth outside U.S. equities.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is a passive fund seeking to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD Net), a market-cap-weighted benchmark capturing ~99% of emerging market investability across large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from 24 countries. Launched in 2012 by BlackRock, it holds approximately 2,660 securities with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (12.53%), Samsung Electronics (6.03%), SK Hynix (4.36%), Tencent Holdings (2.68%), and Alibaba Group (2.13%). Sector allocations tilt heavily toward Information Technology (37.09%), Financials (17.69%), Consumer Discretionary (9.22%), Industrials (8.73%), and Materials (6.94%). Country weights feature Taiwan (~24%), China (~21%), and South Korea (~18%). This structure emphasizes tech-heavy growth drivers while maintaining broad diversification. IEMG rebalances periodically with its benchmark and trades on NYSE Arca with high liquidity.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) passively tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index via sampling, targeting large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from emerging economies worldwide. Introduced in 2005, it boasts over 5,000 holdings—far broader than peers—and an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.06%.

Leading positions feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (12.85%), Tencent Holdings (3.57%), Alibaba Group (2.56%), Reliance Industries (0.89%), and China Construction Bank (0.86%). Key sectors include Technology (26.25%), Financial Services (20.51%), Consumer Cyclical (11.24%), Basic Materials (8.39%), and Industrials (7.88%). Notable country exposures: Taiwan (~29%), China (~25%), India (~14%). VWO's methodology excludes South Korea, prioritizes investability, and incorporates China A-shares, fostering extensive diversification. It rebalances with the index and exhibits robust liquidity on NYSE Arca.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets face a dynamic environment shaped by macroeconomic divergence, with a softening U.S. dollar boosting exports and easing external debt burdens across Asia and Latin America. Capital flows have surged into EM ETFs—over $35 billion in early 2026—driven by AI supply chain expansion in Taiwan and India, alongside stabilizing Chinese growth and commodity tailwinds for Brazil and South Africa. Regulatory shifts, including China A-share inclusions, enhance accessibility, while geopolitical tensions and interest rate trajectories introduce volatility. Sector risks center on tech concentration amid U.S.-China frictions, but demographic advantages and earnings growth (~20-30% projected) position EM for outperformance versus developed peers in recent cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, IEMG has demonstrated relative strength over VWO, with year-to-date gains near 23% versus 13%, fueled by South Korea's ~18% weighting and AI/semiconductor surges from holdings like Samsung and SK Hynix. Broader cycles reflect IEMG's tech tilt (37%) capturing sector rotation, though its higher volatility (~6-7% monthly standard deviation) contrasts VWO's steadier profile (~5%). VWO's deeper diversification mitigates drawdowns during China underperformance but lags in momentum environments tied to easing rates and commodity uptrends. Relative positioning favors IEMG amid current tech dispersion, while VWO appeals for stability amid geopolitical shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like emerging markets ETFs. Explore it today to uncover hidden edges in real-time market dynamics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IEMG with moderate conviction (~60% probability edge over 6-12 months). This stems from structural advantages in South Korea exposure amid AI momentum, superior recent trend consistency, and tech sector alignment outweighing VWO’s cost and diversification edges. Observable factors like relative flows, volatility-adjusted returns, and momentum signals support this positioning, though risks from EM concentration persist.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEMG vs. VWO commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEMG is a Hold and VWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO (163B) and IEMG (156B) have similar net assets . IEMG has a higher annual dividend yield than VWO: IEMG (16.959) vs VWO (8.724). IEMG was incepted earlier than VWO: IEMG (14 years) vs VWO (21 years). VWO (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than IEMG (0.09). IEMG (6.00) and VWO (6.00) have matching turnover.
IEMGVWOIEMG / VWO
Gain YTD16.9598.724194%
Net Assets156B163B96%
Total Expense Ratio0.090.06150%
Turnover6.006.00100%
Yield2.212.4391%
Fund Existence14 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEMGVWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EATZ27.02N/A
N/A
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
QCJL24.83-0.04
-0.14%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul
FLLA26.36-0.12
-0.45%
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
JAVA76.69-1.15
-1.48%
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
FAD181.23-3.59
-1.94%
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF

IEMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEMG
1D Price
Change %
IEMG100%
-1.77%
BABA - IEMG
75%
Closely correlated
-3.61%
JD - IEMG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
BILI - IEMG
68%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
BIDU - IEMG
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
BZUN - IEMG
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
More

VWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWO
1D Price
Change %
VWO100%
+0.21%
JD - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
BILI - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
BIDU - VWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
BABA - VWO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BZ - VWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More