Advertisement
IEP vs JAMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEP is a Hold and JAMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IEP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JAMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- JAMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while JAMF (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
IEP is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
JAMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.04% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
@Packaged Software (+2.28% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| IEP | JAMF | IEP / JAMF | |
| Capitalization | 7.28B | 2.31B | 315% |
| EBITDA | 150M | -64.95M | -231% |
| Gain YTD | 6.474 | -35.302 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 169.49 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 11.8B | 561M | 2,103% |
| Total Cash | 5.96B | 244M | 2,444% |
| Total Debt | 7.21B | 367M | 1,964% |
IEP | JAMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IEP's Valuation (4) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JAMF (33) in the null industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JAMF (100) in the null industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.
JAMF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as IEP (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JAMF’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JAMF (91) in the null industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JAMF (100) in the null industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than JAMF’s over the last 12 months.
| IEP | JAMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 19 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
IEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEP has been loosely correlated with CVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEP jumps, then CVI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEP | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| CVI - IEP | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CODI - IEP | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DINO - IEP | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| PSX - IEP | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| PBF - IEP | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||