IEP vs NNBR ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEP is a Buy and NNBR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNNBR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NNBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NNBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while NNBR (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -10.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +108.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
IEP is expected to report earnings on Aug 02, 2024.
NNBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.41% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
@Metal Fabrication (+1.03% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| IEP | NNBR | IEP / NNBR | |
| Capitalization | 7.28B | 233M | 3,123% |
| EBITDA | 150M | 13.5M | 1,111% |
| Gain YTD | 6.261 | -16.000 | -39% |
| P/E Ratio | 169.49 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 11.8B | 489M | 2,413% |
| Total Cash | 5.96B | 21.9M | 27,228% |
| Total Debt | 7.21B | 206M | 3,499% |
IEP | NNBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IEP's Valuation (5) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNBR (91) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew significantly faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NNBR (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's SMR Rating (95) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NNBR (97) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
NNBR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as IEP (59) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that NNBR’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNBR (94) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
| IEP | NNBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 16 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EUGCX | 20.73 | 0.23 | +1.12% |
| Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity L | |||
| ARTMX | 36.24 | 0.36 | +1.00% |
| Artisan Mid Cap Investor | |||
| MFUZX | 8.99 | 0.08 | +0.90% |
| MassMutual Fundamental Value I | |||
| GGFRX | 12.59 | 0.11 | +0.88% |
| Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R | |||
| WCFEX | 13.30 | 0.04 | +0.30% |
| WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inv | |||
NNBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and MATW have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and MATW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNBR | 100% | -4.95% | ||
| MATW - NNBR | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| ESAB - NNBR | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| CODI - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.49% | ||
| TRC - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| IEP - NNBR | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||