Ad is loading...
IESVF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SMTLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

IESVF vs SMTLF

Header iconIESVF vs SMTLF Comparison
Open Charts IESVF vs SMTLFBanner chart's image
Invinity Energy Sys
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$13.2K
CapitalizationN/A
GCL New Energy Holdings
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$907
CapitalizationN/A
IESVF vs SMTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IESVF vs. SMTLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESVF is a Hold and SMTLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (IESVF: $0.19 vs. SMTLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: IESVF and SMTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESVF: 66% vs. SMTLF: 54%
Market capitalization -- IESVF: $116.63M vs. SMTLF: $101.13M
IESVF [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $116.63M. SMTLF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $101.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IESVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMTLF is a better buy in the long-term than IESVF.

Price Growth

IESVF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -15.54% price change this week, while SMTLF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (-0.08% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IESVF($117M) has a higher market cap than SMTLF($101M). SMTLF YTD gains are higher at: 6.476 vs. IESVF (-55.897). SMTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. IESVF (-19.17M). SMTLF has more cash in the bank: 586M vs. IESVF (10.9M). IESVF has less debt than SMTLF: IESVF (754K) vs SMTLF (6.61B). SMTLF has higher revenues than IESVF: SMTLF (2.85B) vs IESVF (354K).
IESVFSMTLFIESVF / SMTLF
Capitalization117M101M116%
EBITDA-19.17M1.99B-1%
Gain YTD-55.8976.476-863%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue354K2.85B0%
Total Cash10.9M586M2%
Total Debt754K6.61B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRCC3.020.03
+1.00%
BRC
HHH79.91-0.95
-1.17%
Howard Hughes Holdings
ARE105.58-2.69
-2.48%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
UBX1.21-0.05
-3.97%
Unity Biotechnology
OBIO5.84-0.37
-5.96%
Orchestra BioMed Holdings

IESVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESVF has been loosely correlated with FRHYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IESVF jumps, then FRHYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESVF
1D Price
Change %
IESVF100%
-5.40%
FRHYF - IESVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADHI - IESVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMTLF - IESVF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDWRF - IESVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALCE - IESVF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More

SMTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMTLF has been loosely correlated with TREAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMTLF jumps, then TREAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMTLF
1D Price
Change %
SMTLF100%
N/A
TREAY - SMTLF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSGCY - SMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGAS - SMTLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
TDWRF - SMTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADHI - SMTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More