Ad is loading...
IFACX vs WSBFX
IFACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts IFACX vs WSBFX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer C
Price$25.18
Change+$0.16 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.42B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.35M
IFACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IFACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Mar 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFACX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFACX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. WSBFX (156M). IFACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: IFACX (3.15) vs WSBFX (1.32). IFACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: IFACX (24 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). IFACX (1.33) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.96). IFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). IFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: IFACX (250) vs WSBFX (100000). IFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. WSBFX (1.84). IFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. WSBFX (19.66).
| IFACX | WSBFX | IFACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.96 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.96 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.873 | 0.314 | 1,551% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129B | 156M | 82,692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 1.32 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 1.84 | 555% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.68 | 2.39 | 489% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 19.66 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.77 | 56.27 | 60% |