IFS
Price
$24.51
Change
-$0.41 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
52 days until earnings call
SBNY
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IFS vs SBNY

Header iconIFS vs SBNY Comparison
Open Charts IFS vs SBNYBanner chart's image
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$24.51
Change-$0.41 (-1.65%)
Volume$84.57K
CapitalizationN/A
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$2.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$704
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
IFS vs SBNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
IFS vs. SBNY commentary
Sep 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFS is a Sell and SBNY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2024
Stock price -- (IFS: $24.51 vs. SBNY: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: IFS and SBNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFS: 119% vs. SBNY: 1%
Market capitalization -- IFS: $2.77B vs. SBNY: $3.15M
IFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.77B. SBNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than SBNY.

Price Growth

IFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.48% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFS($2.77B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($3.15M). IFS has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: IFS (9.76) vs SBNY (0.00). SBNY YTD gains are higher at: 31.176 vs. IFS (16.864). SBNY has less debt than IFS: SBNY (2.31B) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than SBNY: IFS (6.82B) vs SBNY (2.7B).
IFSSBNYIFS / SBNY
Capitalization2.77B3.15M88,091%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.86431.17654%
P/E Ratio9.760.00506,646%
Revenue6.82B2.7B253%
Total CashN/A11.3B-
Total Debt10.4B2.31B450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFS vs SBNY: Fundamental Ratings
IFS
SBNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1730
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (39) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (100) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (50) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSSBNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GONIX14.240.06
+0.42%
Gotham Neutral Institutional
LMOIX41.91N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth IS
VGSLX138.64-0.47
-0.34%
Vanguard Real Estate Index Admiral
TLVAX25.75-0.14
-0.54%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value A
GIIAX9.37-0.09
-0.95%
Nationwide International Index A

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-1.65%
BAP - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
SBNY - IFS
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCB - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
RRBI - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
RF - IFS
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More