Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSFX vs WCMLX
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company F
Price$22.33
Change+$0.30 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets592.57M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSFX has more cash in the bank: 593M vs. WCMLX (43M). IHSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSFX (0.88). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSFX (37.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs IHSFX (1000000). IHSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. WCMLX (-1.22). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. IHSFX (-6.30).
| IHSFX | WCMLX | IHSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.79 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.250 | -5.288 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 593M | 43M | 1,379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | -1.22 | -302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.16 | 10.63 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.30 | 13.83 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement