Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSFX vs WCMLX
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company F
Price$22.77
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.13M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.92
Change+$0.22 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSFX has more cash in the bank: 597M vs. WCMLX (42.8M). IHSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSFX (0.88). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSFX (37.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs IHSFX (1000000). IHSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. WCMLX (-3.35). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 19.36 vs. IHSFX (-7.77).
| IHSFX | WCMLX | IHSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.79 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.922 | -1.244 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 42.8M | 1,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -3.35 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.39 | 23.90 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.77 | 19.36 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement