Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSFX vs WCMLX
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IHSFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Company F
Price$22.46
Change+$0.33 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets591.85M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
IHSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSFX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. WCMLX (41.5M). IHSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IHSFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IHSFX (0.88). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSFX (37.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs IHSFX (1000000). IHSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.33 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. IHSFX (-2.94).
| IHSFX | WCMLX | IHSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.79 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.811 | -4.821 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 41.5M | 1,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.33 | -0.65 | -821% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.03 | 17.69 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.94 | 22.28 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement