Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSFX vs WCMNX
IHSFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts IHSFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Company F
Price$22.46
Change+$0.33 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets591.85M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.23
Change+$0.16 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
IHSFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSFX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. WCMNX (41.5M). IHSFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: IHSFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than IHSFX (0.88). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSFX (37.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHSFX: WCMNX (1000) vs IHSFX (1000000). IHSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.33 vs. WCMNX (-0.90). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.82 vs. IHSFX (-2.94).
| IHSFX | WCMNX | IHSFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.04 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.811 | -4.886 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 41.5M | 1,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.33 | -0.90 | -590% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.03 | 16.84 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.94 | 20.82 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement