Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IHSFX vs WCMNX
IHSFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts IHSFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Company F
Price$22.77
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.13M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.74
Change+$0.23 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
IHSFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IHSFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHSFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHSFX has more cash in the bank: 597M vs. WCMNX (42.8M). IHSFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . IHSFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: IHSFX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than IHSFX (0.88). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IHSFX (37.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IHSFX: WCMNX (1000) vs IHSFX (1000000). IHSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. WCMNX (-3.70). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 17.80 vs. IHSFX (-7.77).
| IHSFX | WCMNX | IHSFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.04 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.922 | -1.418 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 42.8M | 1,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -3.70 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.39 | 22.89 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.77 | 17.80 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement