Ad is loading...
ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ILCB vs RECS
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
Price$75.67
Change+$1.69 (+2.28%)
Volume$200
Net Assets889.49M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$32.32
Change+$0.67 (+2.12%)
Volume$388
Net Assets2.28B
ILCB vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCB vs. RECS commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCB is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.28B vs. ILCB (889M). ILCB (-8.563) and RECS (-8.579) have matching annual dividend yield . ILCB was incepted earlier than RECS: ILCB (21 years) vs RECS (6 years). ILCB (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover ILCB (5.00) vs ILCB (5.00).
| ILCB | RECS | ILCB / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -8.563 | -8.579 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 889M | 2.28B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.15 | 20% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 49.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 0.73 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCB | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILCB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCB | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| MSFT - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| AVGO - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| AAPL - ILCB | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| AMZN - ILCB | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| META - ILCB | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||