Ad is loading...
ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ILCB vs RECS
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
Price$74.18
Change-$3.87 (-4.96%)
Volume$800
Net Assets956.93M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.81
Change-$1.77 (-5.27%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.29B
ILCB vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCB vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCB is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. ILCB (957M). ILCB has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: ILCB (-3.532) vs RECS (-8.001). ILCB was incepted earlier than RECS: ILCB (21 years) vs RECS (6 years). ILCB (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover ILCB (5.00) vs ILCB (5.00).
| ILCB | RECS | ILCB / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -3.532 | -8.001 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 957M | 2.29B | 42% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.15 | 20% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 49.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 0.73 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCB | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILCB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCB | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| MSFT - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| AVGO - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| AAPL - ILCB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| AMZN - ILCB | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| META - ILCB | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.60% | ||
More | ||||