Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
ILCB vs RECS
ILCB vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ILCB vs RECS
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
Price$81.18
Change-$1.01 (-1.23%)
Volume$37.86K
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.18
Change-$0.38 (-1.07%)
Volume$434.5K
CapitalizationN/A
ILCB vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILCB vs. RECS commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILCB is a StrongSell and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.36B vs. ILCB (1.18B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ILCB: RECS (26.958) vs ILCB (24.590). ILCB was incepted earlier than RECS: ILCB (20 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover ILCB (4.00) vs ILCB (4.00).
| ILCB | RECS | ILCB / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.590 | 26.958 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.36B | 87% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 45.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 0.89 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILCB | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILCB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCB | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| MSFT - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| AVGO - ILCB | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| AAPL - ILCB | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| AMZN - ILCB | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| META - ILCB | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.00% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.34% | ||
More | ||||