60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
ILF vs SCCO
ILF vs SCCO Comparison
Open Charts ILF vs SCCO
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$23.47
Change-$0.70 (-2.90%)
Volume$780.66K
Net Assets1.33B
Southern Copper
Price$92.91
Change-$4.91 (-5.02%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization82.35B
ILF vs SCCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILF vs. SCCO commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILF is a Hold and SCCO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCCO: Fundamental Ratings
SCCO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILF | SCCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -2.90% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||
SCCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCO has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCCO jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO | 100% | -5.02% | ||
| FCX - SCCO | 84% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| TECK - SCCO | 82% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| HBM - SCCO | 80% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| LUNMF - SCCO | 76% Closely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| TGB - SCCO | 76% Closely correlated | -8.48% | ||
More | ||||