Ad is loading...
ILGCX vs RGABX
ILGCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts ILGCX vs RGABX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$19.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
ILGCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILGCX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILGCX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. ILGCX (194M). ILGCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . ILGCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: ILGCX (11 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than ILGCX (1.18). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: RGABX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. ILGCX (-2.38). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. ILGCX (10.22).
| ILGCX | RGABX | ILGCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.39 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.119 | -2.695 | 264% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 1.96 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.00 | 29.21 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.22 | 36.12 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.41 | 48.37 | 40% |