| IMCG | IWP | IMCG / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 26.105 | 7.697 | 339% |
| Net Assets | 4.2B | 21.2B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.23 | 26% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 24.00 | 188% |
| Yield | 0.63 | 0.36 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| IMCG | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QUBX | 8.50 | 0.16 | +1.92% |
| Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | |||
| REGL | 95.82 | 0.26 | +0.27% |
| ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Arst | |||
| PQJA | 31.71 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| PEJ | 68.95 | -0.08 | -0.12% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
| DRIP | 37.97 | -0.54 | -1.40% |
| Direxion Dly S&P Oil&Gs Ex&Prd Br 2X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with AME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then AME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| AME - IMCG | 67% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| ROK - IMCG | 66% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| NVT - IMCG | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CMI - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| KEYS - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| ONTO - IWP | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| DAL - IWP | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| FIX - IWP | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| BWXT - IWP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| KEYS - IWP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||