89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
IMCG vs OWL
IMCG vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs OWL
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$73.58
Change+$1.40 (+1.94%)
Volume$182.12K
Net Assets2.51B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.40
Change+$0.49 (+2.74%)
Volume$9.44M
Capitalization8.65B
IMCG vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. OWL commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a StrongBuy and OWL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BULZ | 111.01 | 7.46 | +7.20% |
| MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs | |||
| SCHM | 26.21 | 0.60 | +2.34% |
| Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™ | |||
| XPND | 29.65 | 0.64 | +2.21% |
| First Trust Expanded Technology ETF | |||
| SPVU | 50.03 | 0.72 | +1.46% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Enhanced Value ETF | |||
| BUXX | 20.28 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF | |||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.94% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +4.47% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 78% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y