Ad is loading...
IMNTX vs NTCCX
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts IMNTX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt A
Price$18.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.08M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMNTX vs. NTCCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMNTX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. IMNTX (474M). IMNTX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: IMNTX (3.23) vs NTCCX (2.75). IMNTX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: IMNTX (39 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than IMNTX (0.81). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. IMNTX (10.00). IMNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: IMNTX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). IMNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. NTCCX (0.14). IMNTX return over 5 years is better than : 0.26 vs. NTCCX (-0.44).
| IMNTX | NTCCX | IMNTX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.897 | -1.629 | 116% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 653M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 2.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 0.14 | 657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.52 | 4.43 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.26 | -0.44 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.00 | 10.55 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...