Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMNTX vs NTCCX
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts IMNTX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt A
Price$18.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.83M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMNTX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMNTX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. IMNTX (472M). IMNTX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: IMNTX (3.26) vs NTCCX (2.77). IMNTX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: IMNTX (39 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than IMNTX (0.81). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. IMNTX (10.00). IMNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: IMNTX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). IMNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.44 vs. NTCCX (-0.52). IMNTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.75 vs. NTCCX (-3.25).
| IMNTX | NTCCX | IMNTX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.187 | -1.873 | 117% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 646M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.77 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | -0.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 4.34 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.75 | -3.25 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.21 | 10.29 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement