Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMNTX vs NTCCX
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts IMNTX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt A
Price$18.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.77M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.28M
IMNTX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMNTX vs. NTCCX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMNTX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 650M vs. IMNTX (464M). IMNTX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: IMNTX (3.29) vs NTCCX (2.79). IMNTX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: IMNTX (39 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than IMNTX (0.81). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. IMNTX (10.00). IMNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: IMNTX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.33 vs. IMNTX (-2.69). IMNTX return over 5 years is better than : -4.55 vs. NTCCX (-5.03).
| IMNTX | NTCCX | IMNTX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.699 | -1.701 | 100% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 464M | 650M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.79 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.69 | -2.33 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.01 | 1.33 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.55 | -5.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.02 | 9.74 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers