IMO
Price
$64.15
Change
-$1.75 (-2.66%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
NFG
Price
$59.13
Change
-$1.50 (-2.47%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IMO vs NFG

Header iconIMO vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts IMO vs NFGBanner chart's image
Imperial Oil
Price$64.15
Change-$1.75 (-2.66%)
Volume$3.43K
CapitalizationN/A
National Fuel Gas
Price$59.13
Change-$1.50 (-2.47%)
Volume$3.28K
CapitalizationN/A
IMO vs NFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
IMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMO vs. NFG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMO is a Buy and NFG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IMO: $64.22 vs. NFG: $59.10)
Brand notoriety: IMO and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMO: 88% vs. NFG: 106%
Market capitalization -- IMO: $36.97B vs. NFG: $4.92B
IMO [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $36.97B. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IMO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMO is a better buy in the long-term than NFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IMO and NFG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IMO (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -12.45% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMO is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

NFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-3.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMO($37B) has a higher market cap than NFG($4.92B). NFG (11.18) and IMO (11.12) have similar P/E ratio . NFG YTD gains are higher at: 24.219 vs. IMO (15.230). IMO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.35B vs. NFG (1.15B). IMO has more cash in the bank: 864M vs. NFG (41.7M). NFG has less debt than IMO: NFG (2.69B) vs IMO (4.33B). IMO has higher revenues than NFG: IMO (48.3B) vs NFG (2.04B).
IMONFGIMO / NFG
Capitalization37B4.92B753%
EBITDA8.35B1.15B724%
Gain YTD15.23024.21963%
P/E Ratio11.1211.1899%
Revenue48.3B2.04B2,368%
Total Cash864M41.7M2,072%
Total Debt4.33B2.69B161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMO vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
IMO
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1236
SMR RATING
1..100
4566
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
452
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMO's Valuation (42) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as NFG (65). This means that IMO’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

IMO's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as NFG (36). This means that IMO’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

IMO's SMR Rating (45) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as NFG (66). This means that IMO’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as IMO (58). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to IMO’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMO (45). This means that NFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMONFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UA7.830.21
+2.76%
Under Armour
INFU9.070.21
+2.37%
InfuSystem Holdings
NXTT2.140.01
+0.47%
Next Technology Holding
EG355.06-2.71
-0.76%
Everest Group Ltd
SSYS9.99-0.25
-2.44%
Stratasys Ltd

IMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMO has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMO jumps, then SU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMO
1D Price
Change %
IMO100%
-0.80%
SU - IMO
81%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
CVE - IMO
78%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
SHEL - IMO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
XOM - IMO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
BP - IMO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with EC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then EC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
-0.39%
EC - NFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
XOM - NFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
CVX - NFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
IMO - NFG
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
E - NFG
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More